Short Term 12
OK, so I watched a Netflix movie last night called Short Term 12, which was really interesting but got me to thinking about a lot of pastoral care issues. My myopic focus these days is relating everything to pastoral care ever since I started this CPE internship. I walk around asking myself, “If I were engaging in pastoral care, what would I do in that situation?” “Am I creating an unhealthy triangle with the other two people?” “Am I being empathic or am I crossing a boundary?” Excessive, isn’t it?
But (OK, I can’t let it go) when I saw Short Term 12, which is an excellent movie, with the feel of a documentary, about the staff and residents of a short term care facility for youth with challenging family situations, I kept asking myself that last question—is it empathy or is it crossing a boundary? The staff, most of whom grew up in challenging family situations and bear the scars of their childhoods, care for the youth with a loving yet firm disciplinary style. At the same time they are empathetic, the staff also creates family-like bonds with they youth by sharing their stories and giving appropriate affection.
In one scene, a staff member shows her cutting scars to a young woman who is also cutting, which can be a way of avoiding emotional pain by focusing on the wound rather than what is causing the pain—it is often a “safe” way for youth to express their emotions while at the same time not having to confront an abuser. In this situation, and granted it was a movie, this was an effective way for the staff member to get the youth to open up and share her pain. Despite being a movie, it does beg the question—how much does a pastoral care giver share?
In the pastoral care setting in which I currently work, we are asked to maintain a personal boundary between ourselves and residents and are encouraged to listen empathetically but not share our stories because this may be a distraction from the resident’s story. The contexts are different—youth versus adults—yet many of the characteristics were the same—long-term residents and short-term residents, people with extreme need for care, people dealing with physical and mental trauma. So, I’m not completely off base when comparing the situations, yet the type of care provided was so different. I wonder if this is typical in short term care facilities for youth or if they just made it up for the movie.
In another scene of the movie, we see two staff member accompany a youth to the hospital and wait while he is being treated. It seemed so natural for this to happen and didn’t seem to cross a boundary. In a similar situation, I volunteered to accompany a staff intern, from my CPE setting, to a clinic because she passed out. She chose a clinic rather than a hospital because she did not have adequate health care coverage. After making sure this adventure would not interfere with my care and my family’s care, I decided that I wanted to take her to the clinic where we sat for several hours talking about her life and her dreams for her career. Later, I was talked to by my supervisor who strongly suggested that I crossed a boundary by taking away the agency of the staff member to figure out how to care for herself. I was aghast! In the moment of confronted with taking her to the clinic all I asked myself was, “If this was my daughter, would I want someone like me to take her to the clinic?” My answer was a resounding, “Yes, of course.” That was the question that guided my decision. It felt like the most loving thing to do, and by engaging in the situation, I learned a whole lot about this person and we bonded. But it does beg the questions—what is empathy and when does empathy cross a boundary when it becomes physical action or when can empathy involve sharing one’s story?
Watching the movie, regardless of how real life it was, did ask me to reflect on these questions about empathy and care. I was also drawn to reflecting on Jesus’ care for the other/stranger/foreigner/vulnerable that I learn from Scripture. Jesus was engaged. I just read the story of Jesus at the well with the Samaritan woman and was struck by how Jesus did not maintain cultural boundaries but broke every one—he talked to a woman, AND he talked to a Samaritan, which were both forbidden in his culture. Given the choice again, I’d still choose to take the staff intern to the hospital and to sit with her like I did until her boyfriend showed up to care for her. It was the right thing to do—it was a good boundary to cross.
